§ 75

Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung — Article § 75🇩🇪

Statistics

1 decisions

By Year

2025

By Court

Bundesverfassungsgericht

Article Article § 100 Article § 101 Article § 102 Article § 103 Article § 104 Article § 105 Article § 108 Article § 110 Article § 114 Article § 117 Article § 118 Article § 120 Article § 121 Article § 122 Article § 123 Article § 125 Article § 127 Article § 128 Article § 129 Article § 130 Article § 132 Article § 132 ff.Article § 133 Article § 134 Article § 135 Article § 137 Article § 138 Article § 141 Article § 144 Article § 146 Article § 151 Article § 153 Article § 154 Article § 154 ff.Article § 155 Article § 156 Article § 158 Article § 159 Article § 161 Article § 162 Article § 166 Article § 173 Article § 189 Article § 4 Article § 40 Article § 42 Article § 43 Article § 44 Article § 45 Article § 47 Article § 49 Article § 50 Article § 52 Article § 53 Article § 54 Article § 55 Article § 56 Article § 58 Article § 59 Article § 60 Article § 61 Article § 65 Article § 67 Article § 68 ff.Article § 70 Article § 71 Article § 72 Article § 73 Article § 74 Article § 79 Article § 80 Article § 81 Article § 82 Article § 83 Article § 86 Article § 88 Article § 90 Article § 91 Article § 92 Article § 93 Article § 94 Article § 95 Article § 96 Article § 98 Article § 99

Decisions

1 BvR 1902/24 — 24 April 2025

24 April 2025·1 BvR 1902/24

Stattgebender Kammerbeschluss: Erfolgreiche Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen sozialgerichtliche Kostengrundentscheidung nach unstreitiger Erledigung einer Untätigkeitsklage - hier: unvertretbare Bejahung eines zureichenden Grundes für die Verspätung gem § 88 Abs 1 S 1 SGG verletzt das Willkürverbot