Skip to main content

Search Decisions

The Case Law Hub search feature provides comprehensive access to court decisions from across the European Union. Our search index covers decisions from Romania, Germany, the Netherlands, France, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), and the EUR-Lex repository, giving you a single unified entry point for European legal research. Whether you are a legal professional, academic researcher, or law student, the search tool is designed to help you find relevant case law quickly and efficiently. You can search using several different methods depending on what information you have available. If you know the exact ECLI identifier of a decision, entering it directly will take you straight to that decision's detail page. The European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) is a standardized identifier format used across the EU — it follows the pattern ECLI:COUNTRY:COURT:YEAR:NUMBER and provides a permanent, unique reference for every court decision. For broader searches, you can use keywords related to the legal issues, parties, or subject matter of the cases you are looking for. The search also supports case numbers and court names, making it flexible enough to accommodate whatever information you have at hand. To get the most out of your searches, try using specific legal terms rather than general ones. European court decisions often contain specialized legal vocabulary, and using precise terminology will yield more relevant results. If you are searching across multiple jurisdictions, consider trying your search terms in different languages — a decision from a French court may use different terminology than a similar decision from a German court, even when addressing the same legal question. You can also narrow your results by applying filters for country, court, category, or date range to focus on the most relevant decisions for your research needs. When you perform a search, results are displayed as decision cards. Each card shows the decision title, the court that issued it, the decision date, and a brief summary of the case. This format allows you to quickly scan through results and identify which decisions are most relevant before clicking through to the full detail page. From the detail page, you can access the complete decision text, view related legal provisions, and explore additional metadata including the language of the decision, the source database, and links to related cases. The search feature is designed to support both quick lookups and in-depth research. Whether you are checking a single citation or conducting a comprehensive review of case law across multiple EU member states, the search tool provides the flexibility and coverage you need for effective European legal research.

11734 results found

XI ZR 64/24 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·XI ZR 64/24

BGH, 03.02.2026, XI ZR 64/24

VIa ZR 974/22 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·VIa ZR 974/22

BGH, 03.02.2026, VIa ZR 974/22

2 B 39.25 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·2 B 39.25

BVerwG, 03.02.2026, 2 B 39.25

3 StR 589/25 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·3 StR 589/25

BGH, 03.02.2026, 3 StR 589/25

XI ZR 159/24 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·XI ZR 159/24

BGH, Urteil vom 3. Februar 2026 - XI ZR 159/24

VIa ZR 566/22 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·VIa ZR 566/22

BGH, 03.02.2026, VIa ZR 566/22

3 StR 496/24 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·3 StR 496/24

BGH, Beschluss vom 3. Februar 2026 - 3 StR 496/24

XI ZR 65/24 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·XI ZR 65/24

BGH, 03.02.2026, XI ZR 65/24

VIa ZR 758/22 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·VIa ZR 758/22

BGH, 03.02.2026, VIa ZR 758/22

2 BvR 1626/25 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·2 BvR 1626/25

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Unzulässige Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen Genehmigungen für die Ausfuhr von Rüstungsgütern nach Israel - keine hinreichende Darlegung einer Verletzung von Art 19 Abs 4 GG durch fachgerichtliche Verneinung einer konkreten grundrechtlichen Schutzpflicht aus Art 2 Abs 2 S 1 GG, Art 1 Abs 2 GG und dem Grundsatz der Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit des GG - allgemein drittschützende Wirkung des § 8 Abs 1 AWG, § 8 Abs 1 AWV iVm § 4 Abs 1 AWG verfassungsrechtlich nicht geboten

6 AV 1.26 — 3 February 2026

3 February 2026·6 AV 1.26

Prozesskostenhilfe; Zuständigkeitsbestimmung; Besorgnis sog. institutioneller Befangenheit aller Richter in einem Oberverwaltungsgerichtsbezirk

2 VR 21.25 — 2 February 2026

2 February 2026·2 VR 21.25

BVerwG, 02.02.2026, 2 VR 21.25

2 B 50.25 — 2 February 2026

2 February 2026·2 B 50.25

Entlassung eines Beamten auf Probe wegen Nichtbewährung "in der Probezeit"

V ZR 76/25 — 30 January 2026

30 January 2026·V ZR 76/25

BGH, Urteil vom 30. Januar 2026 - V ZR 76/25

25 W (pat) 47/24 — 29 January 2026

29 January 2026·25 W (pat) 47/24

BPatG München, 29.01.2026, 25 W (pat) 47/24

III ZR 389/23 — 29 January 2026

29 January 2026·III ZR 389/23

BGH, 29.01.2026, III ZR 389/23

4 StR 539/25 — 29 January 2026

29 January 2026·4 StR 539/25

BGH, 29.01.2026, 4 StR 539/25

I ZB 38/25 — 29 January 2026

29 January 2026·I ZB 38/25

BGH, 29.01.2026, I ZB 38/25

V ZB 39/25 — 29 January 2026

29 January 2026·V ZB 39/25

Bemessung des Streitwerts bei Beschlussersetzungsklage gegen Abrechnungsbeschluss

I ZB 37/25 — 29 January 2026

29 January 2026·I ZB 37/25

Rechtserhaltende Benutzung einer Arzneimittelmarke